Hence, it is necessary to provide a summary and analysis of that purported up-to-date scientific evidence which supports the claim that homosexuality is not a mental disorder.
The question comes to mind, then, what exactly does the non-antiquated, that is, the up-to-date, data show about homosexuality? Also, what do the so-called credible experts say about homosexuality? When one browses the Internet, one will see that apparently many of the so-called experts on mental disorders claim that there is a significant amount of scientific evidence in support of the claim that homosexuality is not a mental disorder. The accusation of using outdated material and deviating into realms beyond the scope of one's expertise implies two things first, it implies that there actually is information that is more up-to-date than what the nun presented on the topic of homosexuality, and secondly it implies that there are credible experts who are more qualified to teach or speak on the topic of homosexuality. It is not outright evident what was said, but the event brings to mind some important questions. Regarding the same event, another individual wrote that the nun deviated “into realms of sociology and anthropology,” which are “beyond the scope of her expertise” ( Galbraith 2014). Shortly before this paper was written, a Catholic nun was accused of “using suspect anecdotes, antiquated data, and broad generalizations to demonize gays and lesbians” ( Funk 2014). This article suggests that instead of supporting their claim with scientific evidence, those major medical associations arbitrarily label homosexuality as normal. Those medical associations have proposed that their homosexuality-is-normal claim is based on “scientific evidence.” This article critically reviews that “scientific evidence” and finds that much of their literature does not support the claim that homosexuality is normal. have labeled homosexuality as a normal counterpart of heterosexuality. Since the 1970s, however, major medical associations in the U.S. Lay summary: At one time, homosexuality was considered to be mentally disordered. As a result of their deficiencies and arbitrariness, the credibility those two groups that are typically deemed authoritative and trustworthy is called into question.
This paper summarizes and analyzes that purported scientific evidence and explains that much (if not all) of the evidence is irrelevant and does not support the homosexuality-is-not-a-mental-disorder claim. The American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association have suggested for many years now that there is significant empirical evidence supporting the claim that homosexuality is a normal variant of human sexual orientation as opposed to a mental disorder.
0 kommentar(er)
